• Lovehoney sex toy tester thread 2017

    1485264997
    We enjoy anal [sign in to see picture]
    • Rank: Captain
    • Posts: 1
    • Joined: 14 Oct 2014

    I hello all, I have just signed up for testeng. My SO and I have been using toys in our sealift for quite some time. I made my first reviews yesterday :) just waiting on them to be approved and go live, I hope they are good enough. I am looking forward to hopefully testing some new toys in the future. Good luck all :)

    1485265299
    Sum Sub [sign in to see picture]
    • Rank: Field Marshall
    • Posts: 4001
    • Joined: 4 Dec 2012

    Good luck we enjoy anal :)

    1485288311
    Bakeboy [sign in to see picture]
    • Rank: Captain
    • Posts: 6
    • Joined: 11 Jan 2017

    Hi leanne,

    I've never tried a fleshlight before so I would be very keen on reviewing either of the fleshights you need reviewed.

    Both added to my wishlist

    1485301317
    Eli S [sign in to see picture]
    • Rank: Captain
    • Posts: 2
    • Joined: 22 Dec 2016

    Hi all :) Good luck and happy testing! Wish list updated and for me will be a pleasure to try some new items :) I am interested in Joyride Rattleanke Textured Glass dildo.Fingers crossed. Thank you.

    1485301318
    Eli S [sign in to see picture]
    • Rank: Captain
    • Posts: 2
    • Joined: 22 Dec 2016

    Hi all :) Good luck and happy testing! Wish list updated and for me will be a pleasure to try some new items :) I am interested in Joyride Rattleanke Textured Glass dildo.Fingers crossed. Thank you.

    1485307406
    myghost [sign in to see picture]
    • Rank: Field Marshall
    • Posts: 1287
    • Joined: 30 Dec 2012

    Eli S wrote:

    Hi all :) Good luck and happy testing! Wish list updated and for me will be a pleasure to try some new items :) I am interested in Joyride Rattleanke Textured Glass dildo.Fingers crossed. Thank you.

    Just to let you know your tester list should only have items from http://www.lovehoney.co.uk/community/testers/ in it

    1485334786
    WhyNotTryAnythingOnce [sign in to see picture]
    • Rank: Lieutenant Colonel
    • Posts: 28
    • Joined: 1 Jun 2015

    Continually amazed at how good the toys needing reviewed are! Fleshlights this week?! Mmh, yes please

    1485336870
    Tiger Dick [sign in to see picture]
    • Rank: General
    • Posts: 986
    • Joined: 9 Nov 2016

    WhyNotTryAnythingOnce wrote:

    Continually amazed at how good the toys needing reviewed are! Fleshlights this week?! Mmh, yes please

    I get what you are saying but it shouldn't come as a surprise. Companies of all types hang a lot of faith in the products they stock, but beause it looks great, doesn't mean to say it is. LH has an unsurpassed customer relationship, where they need to be on the top of their game. That has taken years to hone and has been earned through hard work and in part through their testing policy.

    They will have done in-house testing and such like - See "More sex please we're British" the documentry about LH, where a vibrator under development undergoes an in-house test. They were open about the issues on the programme so would clearly not sell them until these issues were resolved.

    They need real life experiences of the products they sell, to advise potential buyers and above all they need to know what they sell, works. They only way that can happen is to give some away in exchange for reliable and honest reviews, they want to know about the bad stuff too - if there is any.

    With testing, IMHO the tester/reviewer should be prepared to be disappointed, and report about why that is so, there could be theme developing across the range/product in which LH (or any other business for that matter) may need to act upon or it is simply a case of Meh - does nothing for the occassional customer and the rest rave about it - horses for courses and all that.

    To balance the be prepared for disappointment view, of course LH wouldn't send items out if they were expecting that to be the reaction, what would be the point? So I'd say the majority of items are under concideration to be stocked and really need a set of real life user experinces to take it to market and are more than likely customer ready.

    1485343358
    Lovehoney - Leanne [sign in to see picture]
    • Rank: Field Marshall
    • Posts: 1798
    • Joined: 9 Oct 2014

    List updated

    I couldn't resist...

    1485343523
    Kittycat102 [sign in to see picture]
    • Rank: General
    • Posts: 1063
    • Joined: 4 Jan 2015

    Ahh it's the Penguin. I have that but haven't tried it yet..

    1485343687
    ThrowMeToTheLesbians [sign in to see picture]
    • Rank: Major General
    • Posts: 123
    • Joined: 19 Oct 2010

    Tiger Dick wrote:

    WhyNotTryAnythingOnce wrote:

    Continually amazed at how good the toys needing reviewed are! Fleshlights this week?! Mmh, yes please

    I get what you are saying but it shouldn't come as a surprise. Companies of all types hang a lot of faith in the products they stock, but beause it looks great, doesn't mean to say it is. LH has an unsurpassed customer relationship, where they need to be on the top of their game. That has taken years to hone and has been earned through hard work and in part through their testing policy.

    They will have done in-house testing and such like - See "More sex please we're British" the documentry about LH, where a vibrator under development undergoes an in-house test. They were open about the issues on the programme so would clearly not sell them until these issues were resolved.

    They need real life experiences of the products they sell, to advise potential buyers and above all they need to know what they sell, works. They only way that can happen is to give some away in exchange for reliable and honest reviews, they want to know about the bad stuff too - if there is any.

    With testing, IMHO the tester/reviewer should be prepared to be disappointed, and report about why that is so, there could be theme developing across the range/product in which LH (or any other business for that matter) may need to act upon or it is simply a case of Meh - does nothing for the occassional customer and the rest rave about it - horses for courses and all that.

    To balance the be prepared for disappointment view, of course LH wouldn't send items out if they were expecting that to be the reaction, what would be the point? So I'd say the majority of items are under concideration to be stocked and really need a set of real life user experinces to take it to market and are more than likely customer ready.

    +1.

    Just because a product is from a reputable company doesn't mean it's amazing. I've seen high end products end up with dismal reviews, or half of them seemingly defective. Other lower end products sometimes end up as must have items that surpass things more expensive. It's a gamble game for companies to run and hope for the best as, in the end, they are a business. LH's customer service and sheer genorosity works in their favour along with ours. They have the leading edge when it comes to a business interacting with thier consumers.

    1485343743
    Lovethekink [sign in to see picture]
    • Rank: Field Marshall
    • Posts: 823
    • Joined: 29 Jun 2012

    I love the look of the penguin 🐧

    1485343757
    ThrowMeToTheLesbians [sign in to see picture]
    • Rank: Major General
    • Posts: 123
    • Joined: 19 Oct 2010

    Lovehoney - Leanne wrote:

    List updated

    I couldn't resist...

    x'D Does it remind anyone else of Kenny from South Park?
    Ah, put me down for it anyway. Been lusting after that style of toy - I want to know what the big deal is!

    1485343938
    WhyNotTryAnythingOnce [sign in to see picture]
    • Rank: Lieutenant Colonel
    • Posts: 28
    • Joined: 1 Jun 2015
    Happy Wednesday sex toy testers...
    1485344178
    bondagegod [sign in to see picture]
    • Rank: Field Marshall
    • Posts: 6796
    • Joined: 2 Feb 2015

    OMG pingu. Absolutely love the photo thank you Leanne certainly made me smile. 😀

    1485344833
    WhyNotTryAnythingOnce [sign in to see picture]
    • Rank: Lieutenant Colonel
    • Posts: 28
    • Joined: 1 Jun 2015

    Tiger Dick and ThrowMeToTheLesbians, completely agree with what you have said. Putting 'good' in my original post has lead to the wrong impression. I was more surprised that Fleshlights were on the testers as they are rather well known toys and would have thought there would already have been reviewed.
    Totally with you both that just because it's a reputable name, doesn't mean it will be good, that's obviously why we are all here. To test the toys and see what they are really like.

    1485345733
    Californication [sign in to see picture]
    • Rank: Colonel
    • Posts: 31
    • Joined: 26 Aug 2015

    Hi Leanne,

    My partner would love to test out the penguin,
    List updated, thank you.

    1485346139
    Daleh90 [sign in to see picture]
    • Rank: Brigadier
    • Posts: 285
    • Joined: 7 Oct 2014

    My partner would love the dildo :p

    1485346371
    captainmeow [sign in to see picture]
    • Rank: Major General
    • Posts: 573
    • Joined: 18 Sep 2016

    Oo list updated! :)

    1485348225
    Tiger Dick [sign in to see picture]
    • Rank: General
    • Posts: 986
    • Joined: 9 Nov 2016

    The Penguin has p p p p piqued our interest, as long as a review isn't needed (may be written but can't guarantee) before Valentines day would love to give our verdict.

    Post a reply to this thread

    Please sign in to post messages to the forum.