• ROCKBOX 2!

    1416963015
    Foxxy [sign in to see picture]
    • Rank: Field Marshall
    • Posts: 1063
    • Joined: 29 Oct 2009

    CutieCurious wrote:

    Spoonerism wrote:

    Hmm, I'm a bit shallow when it comes to my toys. I like them to be beautiful... This doesn't really cut it for me. That, and the fact the attachments are not silicone... nope.

    You're not alone, Spoonerism. I like my toys to be pretty. I agree with the comment earlier in the thread that this looks like a wallpaper sander.

    I'm also really confused as to why it's an extension of the Rockbox range, instead of a stand alone product. It looks nothing like the original Rockbox. It looks like a completely different toy! It would be like marketing the wand as an extension of the Squweel range. The two don't look like they have anything in common.

    I love powerful toys, so the fact that it's 3 times more powerful than the wand is intriguing... but that's literally the only thing about it that's appealing to me at first sight.

    It looks almost identical to the original ROCKBOX, I think you're probably thinking of the ROCKBOX finger, which is completely different. They seem to be creating a series of ROCKBOX toys which are more 'industrial' - I'm excited to see what might be coming next!

    1416963274
    BDSM-curious [sign in to see picture]
    • Rank: Brigadier
    • Posts: 584
    • Joined: 30 Aug 2013

    FoxxyFB wrote:

    No idea why that quoted twice ...

    I had that issue.

    kitty x

    1416968398
    CutieCurious [sign in to see picture]
    • Rank: Major General
    • Posts: 298
    • Joined: 4 Nov 2011

    FoxxyFB wrote:

    It looks almost identical to the original ROCKBOX, I think you're probably thinking of the ROCKBOX finger, which is completely different. They seem to be creating a series of ROCKBOX toys which are more 'industrial' - I'm excited to see what might be coming next!

    Ah, okay. That makes more sense, then. When I search for "Rockbox" on Lovehoney the only two results are the Rockbox finger and this product, which made me think the finger was the original.

    1416969107
    Foxxy [sign in to see picture]
    • Rank: Field Marshall
    • Posts: 1063
    • Joined: 29 Oct 2009

    The original was discontinued a while ago, but if you google it, you should still be able to access the product page :-)

    1416976725
    LibraLover [sign in to see picture]
    • Rank: Field Marshall
    • Posts: 713
    • Joined: 16 Jul 2014

    There's something about the powertool look that I really like....I have far too many things on my wishlist already though!

    1417204267
    DavidB1986 [sign in to see picture]
    • Rank: Field Marshall
    • Posts: 2192
    • Joined: 11 Feb 2009

    A question for those that have tried the ROCKBOX 2...

    As I don't have a vagina, do you reckon the 'hot chick' attachment could be used to stimulate the anus a la rimming?

    With 25% off, I'm tempted... But if I can only really use the one attachment, I'm not sure it's worth it - I know I can send it back but it's hassle...

    Thoughts?

    1417205498
    sleepycelia [sign in to see picture]
    • Rank: Field Marshall
    • Posts: 728
    • Joined: 9 Jan 2011

    Nope, not my thing. I got an email asking if I'd like to test it a while back and turned it down because I imagined it'd be horrendously noisy and the reviews of the original were...yeah. No thankyou!

    1417205856
    Sum Sub [sign in to see picture]
    • Rank: Field Marshall
    • Posts: 4216
    • Joined: 4 Dec 2012

    DavidB1986 wrote:

    A question for those that have tried the ROCKBOX 2...

    As I don't have a vagina, do you reckon the 'hot chick' attachment could be used to stimulate the anus a la rimming?

    With 25% off, I'm tempted... But if I can only really use the one attachment, I'm not sure it's worth it - I know I can send it back but it's hassle...

    Thoughts?

    I think it could David and we were really tempted to try this but tbh once I saw it in action I just thought that's too violent for my delicate starfish
    1417208393
    DavidB1986 [sign in to see picture]
    • Rank: Field Marshall
    • Posts: 2192
    • Joined: 11 Feb 2009

    LOL that was one of my concerns.... Haha
    Thanks for that :)

    1417209972
    Wildcherry [sign in to see picture]
    • Rank: Field Marshall
    • Posts: 725
    • Joined: 13 Aug 2006

    I really dont like the look of it.. I am a bit on the fence here but i dont think it or the finger would be my type of thing at all.

    1417222005
    Smoothman [sign in to see picture]
    • Rank: Captain
    • Posts: 12
    • Joined: 1 Jun 2007

    I missed this because it's not in the male section of the shop. Looks good to me but them I'm a bloke.

    Now as a bloke vibrations aren't unpleasant but instead of vibrating faster and faster I'd much prefer a simple machine that can actually move further, like a centimetre or more back and forth to mimic a wanking motion. Does this fit the bill? In the video we don't really get to see what the male part does. Is it designed to work sideways with the male part? Otherwise I can't see why it has 2 grooves.

    Will there be more attachments coming in the future?

    1417296795
    Subdom27 [sign in to see picture]
    • Rank: Field Marshall
    • Posts: 1478
    • Joined: 27 May 2012

    Looks like it would go well in my shed! Sure seems like it's going to pack a punch!

    1418167152
    jazen1979 [sign in to see picture]
    • Rank: Major
    • Posts: 2
    • Joined: 4 Aug 2009

    Anyone seen a video clip of this toy in use?
    Would be cool to see. :-)

    Post a reply to this thread

    Please sign in to post messages to the forum.