• ROCKBOX 2!

    1416934454
    DavidB1986 [sign in to see picture]
    • Rank: Field Marshall
    • Posts: 2192
    • Joined: 11 Feb 2009

    I admit I'm intrigued, but also unsure. I read some less than positive reviews of the original Rock Box - I may wait til til goes on offer before I consider splurging!

    1416936531
    blonde vixen13 [sign in to see picture]
    • Rank: Field Marshall
    • Posts: 2083
    • Joined: 23 Jun 2012

    It looks like it belong in b&q in the powertook aisle. I'm not sure if I would want it

    1416937869
    truegrace [sign in to see picture]
    • Rank: Field Marshall
    • Posts: 491
    • Joined: 12 Aug 2012

    blonde vixen13 wrote:

    It looks like it belong in b&q in the powertook aisle. I'm not sure if I would want it

    Im the same, all for something powerful, but not liking the looks of it, may just stick with the wand and get the doxy

    1416939340
    myghost [sign in to see picture]
    • Rank: Field Marshall
    • Posts: 1463
    • Joined: 30 Dec 2012

    It looks heavy and intimidating not something i could or would want to use on myself

    1416939873
    jayandrach [sign in to see picture]
    • Rank: Major General
    • Posts: 292
    • Joined: 18 Jan 2012

    Looks and sounds amazing. Especially after reading the reviews on the beast

    1416940475
    Briona87 [sign in to see picture]
    • Rank: Field Marshall
    • Posts: 1075
    • Joined: 29 Jun 2014

    Unusual, yet intriguing, the reviews indicate one could have loads of fun with it. On the other hand, I would be only able to use something like this once in a blue moon, it is apparently a bit too noisy for a quiet(ish) and discreete toy session...

    1416952477
    Purring-Pussy [sign in to see picture]
    • Rank: Field Marshall
    • Posts: 3171
    • Joined: 11 Jun 2012

    Don't think my arthritc hands would manage to hold this. Looks interesting though.

    1416953707
    Sum Sub [sign in to see picture]
    • Rank: Field Marshall
    • Posts: 4218
    • Joined: 4 Dec 2012

    For those worried about holding it on yourself, although it is slightly heavier than the wand, the shape of the handle actually makes it easier to hold in the throes of ecstasy.

    1416954869
    truegrace [sign in to see picture]
    • Rank: Field Marshall
    • Posts: 491
    • Joined: 12 Aug 2012

    its not the holding that bothers me, its that it looks fugly!

    1416955144
    Alpha123 [sign in to see picture]
    • Rank: Brigadier
    • Posts: 80
    • Joined: 21 Dec 2010

    sweet mother of god it looks like us guys are definately redundant now!

    1416955210
    Peitho [sign in to see picture]
    • Rank: General
    • Posts: 342
    • Joined: 24 Feb 2014

    Purring-Pussy wrote:

    Don't think my arthritc hands would manage to hold this. Looks interesting though.

    Holding it didn't work for me anyway as the handle vibrated too much and I couldn't get enough pressure - turning it upside down and riding it though, amazing!

    1416955508
    pinkanimal [sign in to see picture]
    • Rank: Field Marshall
    • Posts: 1470
    • Joined: 5 Feb 2012

    Yeah I'm still not convinced. Ill stick with my wand.

    1416956079
    JuicyJ89 [sign in to see picture]
    • Rank: General
    • Posts: 963
    • Joined: 10 Nov 2008

    looks interesting!

    1416956474
    truegrace [sign in to see picture]
    • Rank: Field Marshall
    • Posts: 491
    • Joined: 12 Aug 2012

    i will hold out for the lovehoney sybian i think!

    1416956933
    dirty_boy [sign in to see picture]
    • Rank: Major General
    • Posts: 184
    • Joined: 1 Mar 2012

    Wow! That looks amazing!

    1416956968
    dirty_boy [sign in to see picture]
    • Rank: Major General
    • Posts: 184
    • Joined: 1 Mar 2012

    @truegrace - there's a LoveHoney Sybian?!?

    1416957472
    Spoonerism [sign in to see picture]
    • Rank: Field Marshall
    • Posts: 328
    • Joined: 16 Jan 2011

    Hmm, I'm a bit shallow when it comes to my toys. I like them to be beautiful... This doesn't really cut it for me. That, and the fact the attachments are not silicone... nope.

    1416961780
    CutieCurious [sign in to see picture]
    • Rank: Major General
    • Posts: 298
    • Joined: 4 Nov 2011

    Spoonerism wrote:

    Hmm, I'm a bit shallow when it comes to my toys. I like them to be beautiful... This doesn't really cut it for me. That, and the fact the attachments are not silicone... nope.

    You're not alone, Spoonerism. I like my toys to be pretty. I agree with the comment earlier in the thread that this looks like a wallpaper sander.

    I'm also really confused as to why it's an extension of the Rockbox range, instead of a stand alone product. It looks nothing like the original Rockbox. It looks like a completely different toy! It would be like marketing the wand as an extension of the Squweel range. The two don't look like they have anything in common.

    I love powerful toys, so the fact that it's 3 times more powerful than the wand is intriguing... but that's literally the only thing about it that's appealing to me at first sight.

    1416962031
    BDSM-curious [sign in to see picture]
    • Rank: Brigadier
    • Posts: 584
    • Joined: 30 Aug 2013

    It looks an amazing piece of kit. I've just fallen in love.

    kitty x

    1416962033
    BDSM-curious [sign in to see picture]
    • Rank: Brigadier
    • Posts: 584
    • Joined: 30 Aug 2013

    It looks an amazing piece of kit. I've just fallen in love.

    kitty x

    Post a reply to this thread

    Please sign in to post messages to the forum.