• G-spot does exist

    1335447027
    2Wicked [sign in to see picture]
    • Rank: General
    • Posts: 154
    • Joined: 26 May 2010

    Doctor finds G-spot in cadaver of 83-year-old woman:

    http://www.cbc.ca/news/health/story/2012/04/25/g-spot-sex-anatomy.html

    How come nobody ever performed a dissection in order to find out whether G-spot exists or not before?

    1335448376
    2nd Chance T [sign in to see picture]
    • Rank: Major
    • Posts: 180
    • Joined: 2 Apr 2012

    I hope so, i'm desperate to find mine!

    1335448770
    Dee_licious333 [sign in to see picture]
    • Rank: General
    • Posts: 1162
    • Joined: 16 Feb 2011

    I didnt think it existed until it was found. Its not as far in as you think and its a soft piece of tissue probably around the size of a 10p coin perhaps smaller. I wouldnt have found it myself though. Get your man practising on you 2nd chance x

    1335449369
    2nd Chance T [sign in to see picture]
    • Rank: Major
    • Posts: 180
    • Joined: 2 Apr 2012

    Dee_licious333 wrote:

    I didnt think it existed until it was found. Its not as far in as you think and its a soft piece of tissue probably around the size of a 10p coin perhaps smaller. I wouldnt have found it myself though. Get your man practising on you 2nd chance x

    That's the plan for the weekend, no kids and lots of play xx

    1335474920
    katmiaow [sign in to see picture]
    • Rank: Brigadier
    • Posts: 183
    • Joined: 11 Mar 2009

    i think everyone's is different- mine is quite high up and feels like a soft little bean! it's a nubbin!!

    mine doesn't really respond to internal vibrators much though so that never work on me- needs manual stimulation! lol

    1335477971
    daneasy [sign in to see picture]
    • Rank: Lieutenant
    • Posts: 24
    • Joined: 9 Jun 2010

    is there a g spot sat nav available? lol

    1335479435
    ShaftMaster [sign in to see picture]
    • Rank: Brigadier
    • Posts: 467
    • Joined: 17 Dec 2010

    From what I keep hearing, it sounds like the G Spot isn't so much does/doesn't exist, but more like boobs. Different women just have different shapes and sizes.

    1335566069
    Lolliepop80 [sign in to see picture]
    • Rank: Officer Cadet
    • Posts: 9
    • Joined: 21 Aug 2010

    I saw a trashy American tv programme where one of the characters had an injection internally (probably collagen) to make her g-spot more pronounced and easier to be accessed during sex... Does such a treatment exist? Or is it too good to be true?

    1335566276
    ShaftMaster [sign in to see picture]
    • Rank: Brigadier
    • Posts: 467
    • Joined: 17 Dec 2010

    Lolliepop80 wrote:

    I saw a trashy American tv programme where one of the characters had an injection internally (probably collagen) to make her g-spot more pronounced and easier to be accessed during sex... Does such a treatment exist? Or is it too good to be true?

    Wouldn't surprise me, I've heard stories of people having a 'hymenplasty', where surgeons recreate a hymen, so I'd say anything is possible.

    1335571995
    2Wicked [sign in to see picture]
    • Rank: General
    • Posts: 154
    • Joined: 26 May 2010

    It's true, doctors inject a filler to the g-spot:

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-179695/How-boost-libido-lunch-hour.html

    1335572154
    Alicia D'amore [sign in to see picture]
    • Rank: Field Marshall
    • Posts: 3434
    • Joined: 2 Feb 2008

    2Wicked wrote:

    It's true, doctors inject a filler to the g-spot:

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-179695/How-boost-libido-lunch-hour.html

    Hehe! I don't doubt you - but using the Mail as a source is not usually preceded by the statement "it's true"!

    Made me smile :)

    Adxx

    1335572415
    ShaftMaster [sign in to see picture]
    • Rank: Brigadier
    • Posts: 467
    • Joined: 17 Dec 2010

    Alicia D'amore wrote:

    Hehe! I don't doubt you - but using the Mail as a source is not usually preceded by the statement "it's true"!

    Agreed!

    1335572697
    2Wicked [sign in to see picture]
    • Rank: General
    • Posts: 154
    • Joined: 26 May 2010

    Sorry about that link, posted it mainly because it was about how a woman experienced the procedure.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G-Spot_amplification

    http://abcnews.go.com/Health/PictureOfHealth/story?id=4312986&page=1#.T5sq5FFLS8A

    Better now?

    1335575452
    Alicia D'amore [sign in to see picture]
    • Rank: Field Marshall
    • Posts: 3434
    • Joined: 2 Feb 2008

    2Wicked wrote:

    Sorry about that link, posted it mainly because it was about how a woman experienced the procedure.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G-Spot_amplification

    http://abcnews.go.com/Health/PictureOfHealth/story?id=4312986&page=1#.T5sq5FFLS8A

    Better now?

    As I said, I didn't doubt you! But Wiki is definitely more reliable :P

    Adxx

    1335575709
    ShaftMaster [sign in to see picture]
    • Rank: Brigadier
    • Posts: 467
    • Joined: 17 Dec 2010

    Alicia D'amore wrote:

    As I said, I didn't doubt you! But Wiki is definitely more reliable :P

    I know a few lecturers who might take issue with that . . .

    1335578923
    Alicia D'amore [sign in to see picture]
    • Rank: Field Marshall
    • Posts: 3434
    • Joined: 2 Feb 2008

    ShaftMaster wrote:

    Alicia D'amore wrote:

    As I said, I didn't doubt you! But Wiki is definitely more reliable :P

    I know a few lecturers who might take issue with that . . .

    Hence the tongue smiley!

    I didn't say it was reliable either - just more reliable than the Daily Mail....but then it's hard to think of many things that *aren't* more reliable than the Daily Mail.

    Adx

    1335580012
    ShaftMaster [sign in to see picture]
    • Rank: Brigadier
    • Posts: 467
    • Joined: 17 Dec 2010

    Alicia D'amore wrote:

    ShaftMaster wrote:

    Alicia D'amore wrote:

    As I said, I didn't doubt you! But Wiki is definitely more reliable :P

    I know a few lecturers who might take issue with that . . .

    Hence the tongue smiley!

    I didn't say it was reliable either - just more reliable than the Daily Mail....but then it's hard to think of many things that *aren't* more reliable than the Daily Mail.

    Adx

    That's true. Maybe the Daily Star?

    1335618602
    2Wicked [sign in to see picture]
    • Rank: General
    • Posts: 154
    • Joined: 26 May 2010

    At this point, I should also explain that by saying "it's true", I wasn't referring to that particular article/link, therefore it really depends on how you read anything. I knew about g-spot amplification long before posting anything about it here and surely didn't rely on any online source of information. I discussed it with a doctor years ago, which (to me) is reliable. I apologise for not being able to post a link about that discussion here.

    1335624009
    Alicia D'amore [sign in to see picture]
    • Rank: Field Marshall
    • Posts: 3434
    • Joined: 2 Feb 2008

    Don't worry 2W I knew you wouldn't be basing it on that :) I know you value reliable evidence and the like!

    Adxx

    1335628433
    2nd Chance T [sign in to see picture]
    • Rank: Major
    • Posts: 180
    • Joined: 2 Apr 2012

    Tried last night, couldn't find it!

    Post a reply to this thread

    Please sign in to post messages to the forum.