• Cut or Uncut?

    1445840836
    Lovehoney - Dani [sign in to see picture]
    • Rank: Major General
    • Posts: 142
    • Joined: 18 Feb 2015

    Dali256 wrote:

    non mutilated penises are my preference

    Would you consider somebody who elected to have a circumcision (whether due to a condition eg paraphimosis or for cosmetic preferences) to have a mutilated penis?

    Not trying to be snarky as I do believe men should have the choice, just curious.

    1445870331
    RedCheeks [sign in to see picture]
    • Rank: Field Marshall
    • Posts: 248
    • Joined: 1 Jul 2008

    I recently noticed that a couple of companies have brought out dildos with the uncut look. As someone who has been waiting years for a dildo with that aesthetic I'm excited to see this happening!

    Tantus is one of the companies that's brought one out, I'm just waiting for Lovehoney or another UK site to start stocking them.

    1445937106
    LOVE [sign in to see picture]
    • Rank: Lieutenant Colonel
    • Posts: 203
    • Joined: 19 Jan 2009

    have had sex with cut and uncut males

    dont mind either but some times cut ones look bigger

    1446584123
    pegguin [sign in to see picture]
    • Rank: Lieutenant Colonel
    • Posts: 228
    • Joined: 14 Aug 2015

    Uncut for sure. I wouldn't wish a massive reduction in sexual sensation, stolen away when most are babies, on anyone.

    Lovehoney - Dani wrote:

    Dali256 wrote:

    non mutilated penises are my preference

    Would you consider somebody who elected to have a circumcision (whether due to a condition eg paraphimosis or for cosmetic preferences) to have a mutilated penis?

    Not trying to be snarky as I do believe men should have the choice, just curious.

    For sure not. The amount of entirely unjustifiable circumcisions that take place on presexually mature men for absolutely zero reason is awful. I guess people using language like 'mutilated' is an attempt to try push society towards accepting that nonmedical circumcision is an awful thing to do to a child and that there is no reason to perform a dangerous surgery which directly reduces sexual pleasure for reasons as spurious as 'it looks nicer' and 'its easier to clean' (yes, there are medical reasons for circumcision, but it is a very large minority of cases). People shouldn'#t be using the mangled language though. Dont put the guys who had no choice about their circumcision down, just teach the parents the multitude of down sides.

    1446658315
    Dali256 [sign in to see picture]
    • Rank: Major General
    • Posts: 399
    • Joined: 1 Mar 2010

    Lovehoney - Dani wrote:

    Dali256 wrote:

    non mutilated penises are my preference

    Would you consider somebody who elected to have a circumcision (whether due to a condition eg paraphimosis or for cosmetic preferences) to have a mutilated penis?

    Not trying to be snarky as I do believe men should have the choice, just curious.

    Of course not, if someone chooses to do it or its for a medical reason then thats perfectly fine. Just like any other choice about your own body, scars etc. I also dont consider a woman choosing to have cosmetic surgery on her vagina to be mutilated.

    My objection is to doing to small children without consent and that most people seem perfectly fine with this. It gets infuriating that snipping off pieces of small boys for no reason is apparently acceptable.

    I'm against genital mutilation in both sexes so I use the same language for both.

    Post a reply to this thread

    Please sign in to post messages to the forum.