Ginger Ninja Minge wrote:
For me, I just find it rather... well, stupid to be honest... It's like they're actually asking for a rape.
Ouch. That is a comment that may upset a few members, including myself.
Consider a scenario comprising of one of those 'oh so manly' perma-tanned orange 'lads' with blonde tips who swagger around city centres with England tops tied around their waists in the summer; and a cougar on the prowl desperate to escape the monotony of her sexless marriage to a bald middle aged insurance broker who is trying to reclaim some element of his youth through his pursuit of leathers and various two-wheeled petrol driven appliances. Then consider said cougar decides that man 'looks up for it' or looks a bit of a 'man-slag' and proceeds to sexually abuse him in some way, only it turns out he's gay and has not the slightest interest in aggressive sexually frustrated women.
He may look ridiculous (he does, really ridiculous) but that doesn't really justify raping him for getting his 'tits' out. Control of a person's sexual desires rests with the desirer not the desired. Yes, sensible precautions should be taken in some places (we all know some areas are not as safe as they should be [this includes other considerations too such as not having valuables on show]) but responsibility lies with the perpetrator and not the victim who can only simply play a percentages game to ensure their safety (dressing 'suggestively' at Tesco shouldn't really be a place for a lady to worry about rape).
Apologies of that sounds a bit harsh, it's not meant to be, I just thought an illustration highlighting the absurdity may prove illuminating (and I believe you may be unfamiliar with my rather direct way of saying things).
Now, back to the occasional lurking.