Found a typo

It was a long day MM!

I'll sort it out...

 

LoveHoney - Steve wrote:

It was a long day MM!

I'll sort it out...

Lol thanks 

 Well the same item reviewed at the same time by the same person, twice.

http://www.lovehoney.co.uk/product.cfm?p=6406&reviewid=28499#customer_reviews

http://www.lovehoney.co.uk/product.cfm?p=6406&reviewid=28500#customer_reviews

SHOULD SAY FLAVOURED RATHER THAN WATER BASED IN PRODUCT NAME?

Pasante Wild Strawberry is a fresh and fruity flavoured lubricant that will give you deliciously pleasing oral sensations and an intensely sensual experience. A great quality and value lube from Pasante, a trusted UK-based company.

http://www.lovehoney.co.uk/product.cfm?p=19826

Adx

Fixed! 

http://www.lovehoney.co.uk/product.cfm?p=17790

The batteries are included as stated in the description. It needs to be corrected in the info bit.

Hey, not exactly a typo but as close as I could get. I guess I got some sort of subliminal message from the G-Ki video, but, after having a horrible downer after three hours of apparent charging and a quick internet search to see what was wrong when it wouldn't come to life, I discovered that you need to clip the charger on the opposite way as shown on the video or it wont start charging.

Maybe a little graphic added to the pictures showing the wire end facing the head? Or something in the description mentioning the little red LED under the silicon?

It's my own fault for not fully reading the instructions that cae with it but there must be other folks out there like me that only browse before diving in. =P That little light coming on when I flipped it was a big relief. =)

Sorry for being a pest!

My review..

http://www.lovehoney.co.uk/product.cfm?p=13558&reviewid=28816#customer_reviews

I don't like typos- especially on my own reviews and I couldn't let this one slide lol. Can the "PK" be changed to "OK" and from the last 2 sentence or so- It's meant to say "which is great" not "which is it great".

Thanks, xXx

My review  http://www.lovehoney.co.uk/product.cfm?p=15950&reviewid=28998#customer_reviews has been edited and this sentence which had a comma now has a full stop and sounds wrong now - 

"Hubby's first description of the experience was 'cold but in a very interesting and pleasant way' and he has reached for this more often than he normally would a lube. We mostly only use lube for toy play, as he loves it."

This was submitted as 'more often than he normally would a lube, we mostly only use lube for toy play, as he loves it ' maybe I should have used ( )  instead of a comma but it looks wrong the way it is.

I thought I had done ok with this review as its layout was not that different from others I have done but it has been changed far more than all my other reviews put together, more paragraphs than I had and some of the wording has been changed but they bits still read ok so not too much of an issue there. Sorry it may seem petty but I did try my best at my review and I know its not at the same level as some other reviewers but I feel kinda sad that its not really my work now!!!

suze9 wrote:

My review  http://www.lovehoney.co.uk/product.cfm?p=15950&reviewid=28998#customer_reviews has been edited and this sentence which had a comma now has a full stop and sounds wrong now - 

"Hubby's first description of the experience was 'cold but in a very interesting and pleasant way' and he has reached for this more often than he normally would a lube. We mostly only use lube for toy play, as he loves it."

This was submitted as 'more often than he normally would a lube, we mostly only use lube for toy play, as he loves it ' maybe I should have used ( )  instead of a comma but it looks wrong the way it is.

I thought I had done ok with this review as its layout was not that different from others I have done but it has been changed far more than all my other reviews put together, more paragraphs than I had and some of the wording has been changed but they bits still read ok so not too much of an issue there. Sorry it may seem petty but I did try my best at my review and I know its not at the same level as some other reviewers but I feel kinda sad that its not really my work now!!!

 Hi suze9, fixed the sentence and also sent you an email rather than ramble here!

Thanks Alice that looks good. Stupid IE and Yahoo notepad mashing up my review, poor editor must have had a fit when they seen that mess, fully explains why it looks different xxx

Hey, just noticed something with the Cobra Libre. It's described as being fully waterproof, but the "Waterproof?" bit says it's only splashproof. =)

Tracey Cox Supersex Sensation Stroker

http://www.lovehoney.co.uk/product.cfm?p=20020

...and the award for psychic typo spotter of the month goes to - Mr Monster!

Have just submitted a review for this, but noticed that the photo to illustrate it showed the back view of the packaging (4th picture in the main page)

With any luck this can be fixed before it goes live!

Wooo! Yay me!

Pixieking - fixed!

Mr Monster - need a bit more info... or has it been fixed over the weekend?

http://www.lovehoney.co.uk/product.cfm?p=7697

Note, hair must be removed prior to use of the inhibitor for the errect to take place

Hoping thats meant to say effect because I'm not aiming for an err-ection

LittleKitty wrote:

http://www.lovehoney.co.uk/product.cfm?p=7697

Note, hair must be removed prior to use of the inhibitor for the errect to take place

Hoping thats meant to say effect because I'm not aiming for an err-ection

 Fixed! (Double typo - it also said the hair becomes thinner and finder )

Hey folks. The Jimmyjane form 6 has a typo in the information section. It says "No" beside waterproof, but the jimmyjane site says it is.

Thankies. =)

Pixieking wrote:

Hey folks. The Jimmyjane form 6 has a typo in the information section. It says "No" beside waterproof, but the jimmyjane site says it is.

Thankies. =)

Not the case with JJ stuff since I'm sure it is what it says it is. But I've noticed LH sometimes put non waterproof on things that claim to be waterproof but aren't great build quality and aren't worth the risk!

Adx

Yeah, i've seen that before on stuff, but since the description above where it says it's not waterproof says it's shower friendly, and that it's retailing at nearly £150 says it's probably a mistake. =)

Doh this should read 'whose manhood is trim' not 'who's' in the last line. Sorry, folks.

http://www.lovehoney.co.uk/product.cfm?p=20175&reviewid=30979#customer_reviews